A day or two later CNN apologized for the error. They said "we had a report that inadvertently and wrongly characterized the plea from a Milwaukee woman who's brother was killed by police." Although they certainly wrongly characterized the comments as a "call for piece." The included the word inadvertently which softens their offense. The problem is that there is no way that could be accurate. Some had to edit that video. So at least one person was intentionally lying. My guess it was a lot more than one.
At the end of the apology they said that they "regret the second part of the statement was not included." That is a lie. The whole point of including the first part of the statement was to show the sister of the "victim" of "police" brutality was calling for peace. If taking this quote out of context was not an option they would have just omitted all together. They would have not included the clip in context because it contradicted the narrative of the original story.
CNN if you want me to believe you are interested in telling the truth and relating the news, then every time this happens any apology showed be paired with the firing of anyone who knew that this lie was being perpetrated. Even if that meant half of the news room. You did that and I would believe your apology. And it would only take one or two times before it never happened again.
You can be as biased in your news coverage as you want. I don't care. Just be honest about it and don't lie. I mean that's a pretty low standard isn't it?